Thursday, June 30, 2005

CAFTA Vote in Senate Could Be Today!

This from late yesterday, Associated Press material. Note that the article completely ignors the opposition to CAFTA from groups other than Congressional Democrats (e.g., Constitutionalists).

Senate Panel Narrowly Endorses CAFTA
By JIM ABRAMS, Associated Press Writer
Wed Jun 29, 5:08 PM ET


WASHINGTON - Senate supporters of the Central American Free Trade Agreement, a market-opening deal with six Latin American nations, predicted victory Wednesday after it was endorsed by a crucial committee.

President Bush and his top trade officials have lobbied hard for CAFTA, but it has drawn tenacious opposition from lawmakers who believe their states would be hurt.

A Senate vote could come as early as Thursday.

The greater hurdle will come when the House takes up the measure next month. House Democrats who object to what they say are weak labor rights provisions in the agreement will be joined in opposition by Republicans with ties to groups, most notably the sugar industry, that contend they will be hurt by CAFTA.

Earlier Wednesday, the Senate Finance Committee gave its approval on a voice vote to the agreement signed a year ago with Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and the Dominican Republic.

"Step by step, we're making good progress and building momentum for its successful passage," said U.S. Trade Representative Rob Portman, who has led the effort to sway undecided lawmakers.

He picked up a key vote Wednesday when Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., a Finance Committee member, announced his support after receiving a pledge from Portman of increased spending to protect Central American workers and farmers.

Portman, in a letter to Bingaman, said the administration was committed to spending $160 million over four years to promote labor and environmental laws, as well as $150 million over five years to help subsistence farmers in three Central American countries who might be displaced by an increase in U.S. agriculture imports.

The Bush administration has so far succeeded in enacting free trade agreements with Singapore, Chile, Australia and Morocco, but the CAFTA deal has been far more difficult, mainly because of near-united Democratic opposition. Democrats say provisions on labor rights are weak and will lead to a continuation of abuses such as child labor and crackdowns on organized labor.

They also say trade deals, such as the 1994 accord with Mexico and Canada, have exacerbated the U.S. trade deficit and the flight of U.S. jobs overseas.

Rep. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, who has led the opposition in the House, predicted that in the Senate "CAFTA will pass with the lowest margin of any trade agreement in the modern era. With the real fight in the House, the deal is anything but done."

CAFTA would end trade barriers now encountered by U.S. goods in the six countries, which already enjoy open access to the U.S. market. It also would clarify investment rules, strengthen protections for intellectual property and, according to supporters, solidify economic and democratic stability in a region that has been wracked by civil wars in the recent past.

"There is a geopolitical component to CAFTA," said Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz. Some fragile democracies in Central America, he said, "are teetering on the edge of continuing to support the United States."

Portman and Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns have also been meeting this week with lawmakers from sugar-growing states and representatives of the sugar industry in an attempt to mollify their fears that increased imports from CAFTA countries, while small, would open the way for a foreign onslaught on the industry.

Two senators who had previously criticized the agreement, Agriculture Committee Chairman Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., and Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., said Wednesday the administration concessions to protect the industry were enough to win their votes. Those included a pilot program to determine whether a sugar-based ethanol initiative is feasible.

Sen. Craig Thomas, R-Wyo., whose state is a big sugar beet grower, said Wednesday he voted against the agreement in the Finance Committee because attempts to broker a deal with the industry had not succeeded. He chided the administration for not moving sooner to find a solution.

The top Democrat on the committee, Sen. Max Baucus of sugar beet-growing Montana, opposes CAFTA, breaking with his usual support of trade agreements.

In addition to saying that the agreement was bad for the sugar industry, he criticized the administration for not consulting more with Congress and for rejecting a proposal to help U.S. service industry workers who lose their jobs because of foreign competition.

"They appear to want to win by the thinnest of margins," Baucus said.

___

On the Net:

U.S. Trade Representative: http://www.ustr.gov/

Comments:
What an interesting blog...always good ingo.

Now there's a new word 'ingo', but it's appropriate anywho, like your info ingo's into my brain.

The people who post here provide good information, as well.

Check out my 'ingo' at my mortgage opportunity reverse resource site. If you have any ideas for making it a better site, let me know.

Thanks and continued future success for you,

James
 
So many blogs and only 10 numbers to rate them. I'll have to give you a 10 because you have done a good job. Great Job,

Free Access To More Information Aboutpublicidad en internet
 
Hi, great site that you have here, i have a site that has everything on it that you would like to know aboutsoft tab viagra Be sure to check it out.
 
The site thatyou are about to visit now has every info that you ever would need aboutcialis genuinerx.net viagra Be sure to check it out. Now over 17k visitors a day !
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?