Thursday, February 16, 2006
Justice Scalia: Hero!
This man should have been made the Chief Justice. (What is John Roberts' actual judicial philosophy, anyway? Was he asked at any point? Does anyone know?) Thanks to Joan Masters for this.
Scalia jeers fans of 'living' charter
The Washington Times
February 15, 2006
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20060214-110917-5396r.htm
PONCE, Puerto Rico (AP) -- People who think the Constitution would break if it didn't change with society are "idiots," U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia says.
In a speech Monday sponsored by the conservative Federalist Society, Justice Scalia defended his long-held belief in sticking to the plain text of the Constitution "as it was originally written and intended."
"Scalia does have a philosophy; it's called originalism. That's what prevents him from doing the things he would like to do," Justice Scalia told more than 100 politicians and lawyers from this U.S. island territory.
He said that, according to his judicial philosophy, there can be no room for personal, political or religious beliefs.
Justice Scalia criticized those who believe in what he called the "living Constitution."
"That's the argument of flexibility, and it goes something like this: The Constitution is over 200 years old, and societies change. It has to change with society, like a living organism, or it will become brittle and break.
"But you would have to be an idiot to believe that," Justice Scalia said. "The Constitution is not a living organism; it is a legal document. It says something and doesn't say other things."
Proponents of the living Constitution want matters to be decided "not by the people, but by the justices of the Supreme Court."
"They are not looking for legal flexibility; they are looking for rigidity. Whether it's the right to abortion or the right to homosexual activity, they want that right to be embedded from coast to coast and to be unchangeable," he said.
Justice Scalia was invited to Puerto Rico by the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies. The organization was founded in 1982 as a debating society by students who thought professors at the top law schools were too liberal.
Scalia jeers fans of 'living' charter
The Washington Times
February 15, 2006
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20060214-110917-5396r.htm
PONCE, Puerto Rico (AP) -- People who think the Constitution would break if it didn't change with society are "idiots," U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia says.
In a speech Monday sponsored by the conservative Federalist Society, Justice Scalia defended his long-held belief in sticking to the plain text of the Constitution "as it was originally written and intended."
"Scalia does have a philosophy; it's called originalism. That's what prevents him from doing the things he would like to do," Justice Scalia told more than 100 politicians and lawyers from this U.S. island territory.
He said that, according to his judicial philosophy, there can be no room for personal, political or religious beliefs.
Justice Scalia criticized those who believe in what he called the "living Constitution."
"That's the argument of flexibility, and it goes something like this: The Constitution is over 200 years old, and societies change. It has to change with society, like a living organism, or it will become brittle and break.
"But you would have to be an idiot to believe that," Justice Scalia said. "The Constitution is not a living organism; it is a legal document. It says something and doesn't say other things."
Proponents of the living Constitution want matters to be decided "not by the people, but by the justices of the Supreme Court."
"They are not looking for legal flexibility; they are looking for rigidity. Whether it's the right to abortion or the right to homosexual activity, they want that right to be embedded from coast to coast and to be unchangeable," he said.
Justice Scalia was invited to Puerto Rico by the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies. The organization was founded in 1982 as a debating society by students who thought professors at the top law schools were too liberal.
